The debate centers around the use of artificial intelligence in the philosophy baccalaureate, making the subject extremely relevant. An Alsatian candidate finds himself before a disciplinary board, accused of having used paragraphs generated by a machine. This situation raises not only ethical questions regarding the use of AI but also prompts a re-examination of the mechanisms for assessing skills.
Academic integrity is under scrutiny. The jury will have to rule on the implications of contemporary technologies within the educational framework. These events open a door to reflecting on the future of *knowledge* in the digital age.
Technology shakes the foundations of traditional assessment. The subsequent decision could redefine relationships between students, teachers, and digital tools.
Suspicions of AI usage
An Alemannic candidate has come under suspicion regarding the use of artificial intelligence during the philosophy exam for the 2024 baccalaureate. The rectorate of Strasbourg announced that the baccalaureate holder was summoned before a disciplinary commission following doubts raised by the teacher who corrected his paper.
Special accommodations and context
The candidate, benefiting from an accommodation to compose on a computer, finds himself in a delicate situation. Indeed, the use of a digital tool in this context has led to questions about the validity of his answers. Paragraphs from his writing reportedly bear disturbing similarities to content generated by AI systems, raising concerns among academic authorities.
Reaction from the academy
Julien Klipfel, deputy secretary general of the Strasbourg academy, clarified that elements of the composition suggested a potential fraud. He stated: “Entire paragraphs seem to correspond to fraud”. The academy ensures that the situation is handled rigorously in order to preserve the integrity of the results.
Candidate’s statement
Heard by the rectorate’s services, the candidate firmly denied any fraudulent intent. His defense hinges on the assertion that his writing was original and did not come from artificial intelligence software. The disciplinary commission will decide on the legitimacy of the suspicions and the truth of the facts.
Potential consequences
The recommendations of the commission could lead to severe sanctions, potentially including a ban on enrollment at a higher education institution. The candidate’s exam results are suspended, casting doubt on his academic future.
A revealing case
This case highlights a growing issue within the educational system. With the emergence of AI tools and platforms like ChatGPT, institutions must double their efforts to detect and prevent cheating. The director mentioned that among the 30,000 candidates, a dozen are summoned for similar cases, illustrating the scale of the phenomenon.
Actors and increased surveillance
Recently, data protection authorities have strengthened regulations on the use of AI. The need to regulate these technologies to prevent abuse in the educational context is becoming apparent. Institutions are being called upon to educate a generation aware of the ethical issues related to these new technologies, as highlighted by this recent report.
An uncertain future
As the school year comes to an end, the repercussions of this case could influence not only the candidate’s future but also the practices of the entire educational system. The reflection on equal opportunities in access to learning tools and technology emerges as a major challenge on the horizon.
FAQ on Bac 2024: A philosophy candidate facing discipline for using AI
What is the role of artificial intelligence in the philosophy exam of the Bac 2024?
Artificial intelligence can be used to write certain passages of an exam paper, raising questions about the legitimacy of its use during exams, particularly regarding the ethics and originality of candidates’ work.
How can a candidate be suspected of having used AI during the exam?
A candidate may be suspected if passages of their paper show marked similarities to texts generated by artificial intelligence, which may have been noted by the examiner during the correction.
What risks does a candidate face if suspected of cheating with AI?
Candidates found guilty of cheating may face sanctions ranging from the annulment of their exam to bans on pursuing higher education, depending on the severity of the fraud determined by the disciplinary commission.
How does the disciplinary commission assess cases of fraud related to AI?
The commission examines evidence provided by the examiner, including suspicious passages from the paper, and considers explanations provided by the candidate during their hearing.
What should a candidate do if summoned by the disciplinary commission?
The candidate should prepare their defense arguments and possibly provide evidence to demonstrate that they did not use AI, as well as prepare to explain their writing process during the exam.
What other forms of cheating are observed in the Bac 2024?
In addition to the use of AI, instances of cheating include the use of cheat sheets, possession of unauthorized electronic devices, or improper behavior, such as attempts to conceal evaluations.
Can a candidate’s results be suspended during the investigation into fraud?
Yes, a candidate’s results can be suspended as long as the disciplinary process is underway, in order to preserve the integrity of the exam and fairness towards other candidates.
What support is offered to candidates during the disciplinary process?
The academies may offer support to candidates to help them understand the process while ensuring that they do not lose their place in a higher education program while awaiting the decision.
