The shadow of artificial intelligences looms over our daily lives. The necessity to evaluate their performance becomes pressing as their use increases. The comparison of the image analysis capabilities of the garden-fresh models: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot, DeepSeek, and Le Chat appears essential.
The panel of use diversifies, each AI trying to rise to the top. Analyzing their responses supports the search for efficiency and relevance. What are the actual strengths and weaknesses of each tool? This assessment will determine not only the preference of users but also their loyalty in the face of the fierce competition underway.
Image Analysis with ChatGPT
During tests, ChatGPT, version GPT-5, demonstrated remarkable execution speed. This OpenAI tool responds effectively to various requests, whether regarding graphic analyses, Discord interface assistance, or information about a camera model. The analysis of images benefits from precise interpretation, relying on a clear understanding of the requests.
The model provides structured and utilitarian responses, favoring bullet lists and subheadings. The answers are succinct without compromising the depth of information. For requests related to Discord and the analysis of Ahrefs, the tool remains relevant, but it makes a slight error in identifying the camera model. The phrasing turns out to be clear, advising intelligently without ambiguity.
Image Analysis with Gemini
Gemini, in its 2.5 Flash version, requires a brief moment of reflection before delivering its responses, a duration that rarely extends beyond a few seconds. This Google model reveals a good understanding of the context, whether related to Discord, graphics, or cameras. Although its responses are effective, they do not always vary in precision.
Regarding the Discord interface, Gemini turns out to be less explicit than ChatGPT; however, it succeeds in guiding the user appropriately. The graphical analysis stands out for its clarity and depth, enforcing valid and functional structuring. Furthermore, Gemini skillfully integrates precautionary advice regarding the camera, adding value to its responses.
Image Analysis with Claude
Claude, equipped with the Sonnet 4.5 model, favors conciseness, which can sometimes lead to a somewhat superficial approach. Evaluations show a respected and relevant analysis but sometimes lack sufficient depth. Regarding Discord, Claude navigates effectively without causing major interpretation issues.
The assessment of the Ahrefs graph appears clear but limited, as the tool lingers on conclusions without deepening the contextual analysis. The explanation for opening the film compartment of the Pentax, while correct, sometimes suffers from unjustified certainties. Claude’s performance remains commendable but requires a call for a more engaging analysis.
Image Analysis with Perplexity
Perplexity presents features of an AI search engine, but it also manages to perform image analysis tasks. During evaluations, this tool responds correctly to specific instructions. The model’s effectiveness in detecting the Discord interface turns out to be satisfactory, as does the description of the Ahrefs graph.
Nevertheless, the responses remain concise but precise, reflecting a certain lack of ambition in the analysis of the graph. On the other hand, the assessment of the camera turns out to be catastrophic, including model errors and incorrect recommendations for the film compartment. A high rating is still lacking for Perplexity according to the requirements of image analysis.
Image Analysis with Copilot
Microsoft’s Copilot delivered surprising results during this image analysis evaluation. It perfectly identified the Discord interface and provided coherent responses regarding the camera. Communication is smooth, allowing easy access to microphone settings or opening the film compartment.
Despite good performance in most tests, a significant error occurs in the analysis of the Ahrefs graph. The misinterpretation of data distorts the evaluation, negatively affecting the tool’s credibility. This gap emphasizes the notion that accurate data analysis is crucial in an AI environment.
Image Analysis with DeepSeek
DeepSeek, in its consumer version, is limited to text extraction from images, thereby excluding interface and photo analysis. When a user attempts to submit an image, the AI indicates its inability to process visuals. This lack of functionality prevents any genuine analysis.
Not only does the tool not understand Discord, but it also gives an incorrect answer by mistakenly designating the camera model. Its inability to process visual data translates into disappointing and unreliable results. The effectiveness of DeepSeek in image analysis remains to be reassessed, especially compared to competing models.
Image Analysis with Le Chat
Le Chat, developed by Mistral, shows commendable interpretation capabilities. The tool does not fail in understanding requests, but some inaccuracies are to be expected. The indications regarding the Discord interface lack precision, hindering the user experience.
An error seeps into the designation of the camera model, incorrectly referring to a Pentax ME Super as a Spotmatic. Special attention is required during graphic evaluations, where reading errors can influence the decision-making process. Le Chat’s performance appears mediocre compared to the standards demanded by other market leaders.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the main artificial intelligence tools compared by BDM?
BDM compared ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot, DeepSeek, and Le Chat for their performance in image analysis.
What features were tested in this AI comparison?
The tested features include the accuracy of image analysis, the relevance of the provided responses, as well as the clarity and richness of the given information.
How do ChatGPT’s performances compare to those of other AI tools?
ChatGPT has shown good performance, offering fast and clear responses, although sometimes too assertive on certain aspects.
What distinguishes Gemini from the other examined artificial intelligences?
Gemini stands out for its clarity of analysis and contextual approach, offering relevant recommendations in addition to responding to prompts.
Is Claude effective in image analysis?
Although Claude shows some analytical capacity, its responses often lack depth and can be too concise, sometimes requiring more details.
Is Perplexity suitable for image analysis like the other AI tools?
Perplexity has shown varied capabilities, successfully responding to certain requests but presenting inaccuracies in camera analysis.
What is Copilot’s weakness in graph analysis?
Copilot made a fatal error in analyzing graphs, misjudging crucial numerical data, which compromises the reliability of its analysis.
Can DeepSeek truly analyze images like its competitors?
No, DeepSeek is limited to text extraction and cannot effectively analyze images, making it less useful than the other AI tools.
Is Le Chat competitive compared to other AIs in image analysis?
Although it can understand requests, Le Chat presents errors in its responses and lacks clarity, making it less competitive against other tools like Gemini and ChatGPT.
What criteria does BDM use to evaluate the relevance of AI responses?
BDM evaluates the relevance of responses based on the AI’s ability to respond accurately and thoroughly to the specific instructions given in the prompts.
